Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Response #11 (for 10/24)

I've been assigned "Ode to a Model" for this post, a poem so jam packed with wordplay that it couldn't be anything but Nabokovian. A few phrases stand out in particular, however.

"butterfly eyelash" - Of course Nabokov would mention this passion of his in his poetry. Besides that, the repetition of the "eye" sound and the "L" sound resonated with me, and reminded me a lot of "Guilty of killing Quilty."

"from dead leaf on the sod / to red leaf on the breeze" - Once again, the repetition of sounds here is lovely and oh-so Nabokov. The use of nature imagery to describe and address an attractive woman is also something I think of as characteristic of Nabokov, keeping in mind Charlotte's lilies in the scene in Lolita where the title character is finally introduced.

"Can one -- somebody asked -- / rhyme 'star' and 'disaster?'" - Nabokov has a flair for interjections, and this line is certainly no exception.

In terms of the meaning of the poem as a whole, it's very reminiscent of both the main characters in The Enchanter and Lolita, though I'm assuming the titular model is at least close to a legal age. The speaker of the poem isn't as overtly sexist, but the sexism is still present (a woman isn't "real" if she's a model? Really?), and while I'm not familiar with any Nabokov works besides the ones assigned in class, from what I've gathered of his novels I don't think that this kind of speaker is exactly a rarity in his writing.

Monday, October 21, 2013

Response #10 (for 10/22)

"We are made into Humbert's judge and jury and are accordingly addressed as 'your honor' and as 'ladies and gentlemen of the jury,' for Humbert presents his legal and moral case to us. Beyond that, we are also 'the astute reader' (p. 274) who is called upon to appreciate Humbert's artistry. Although Humbert asks his 'learned readers' (p. 59, p. 135) to view his history with 'impartial sympathy' (p. 59),
he also wants us to recognize how much we have in common with him: 'Reader! Bruder!' (p. 264). Our dilemma is that we simultaneously have to evaluate a man's life and criticize his artistic creation." (Winston 426-427)

Here, Winston has pointed out a number of Humbert's extraneous word choices, more specifically those that attempt to justify his extraneous word choices. He calls us "astute" and "learned" when it would suffice to simply call us readers, and manipulates us into sympathizing with him by speaking to us with pretty adjectives. This is the same thing he does throughout the novel without addressing the reader directly, and the implication is that he wants to make Lolita a work of art for us, and for her, because that's what every party involved deserves. Lolita deserves it because she's the "light of his life, fire of his loins."  Humbert deserves it because he isn't a bad man, just troubled and tortured and in love. And we deserve it because we're so "astute" and "learned" and simple prose wouldn't be good enough for us.

The problem with this method of Humbert's is that it's not hard to see through, and it becomes incredibly easy to see Humbert as a writer of fiction rather than memoir. The rest of his extraneous words start to stand out, as pointed out by Winston's article, and everything becomes unbearably fictional.

Monday, October 14, 2013

Response #9 (for 10/15)

'"You need not roar at me,' he complained in his strange feminine manner..." (296)

This line, the 'he' being Quilty, once again nods toward Humbert's weird feelings toward women. It makes me wonder if "feminine" in this case specifically refers to the femininity of post-pubescent women, since when Lo has complained throughout the book it is always depicted as something that should be expected from such a young girl; an annoyance, sure, but not worth commenting on.

Aiding this little theory is that Quilty, to any outside observer, reacted extremely calmly to Humbert roaring at him. "You need not roar at me" is more level-headed than anything else in this scene. Calling it a complaint is a complete overreaction on its own, but attaching "feminine" as a descriptor calls to mind his complaints about Valeria and Charlotte throughout the book. It's not about Quilty's reaction to the roaring, it's about Quilty speaking at all.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Response #8 (for 10/3)

(As I've said in class, I'm most interested in dissecting certain places in Lolita in which Humbert is using very specific word choices to get the readers on his side.)

One word in particular that stands out to me in the conclusion of Part One is in the very last sentence, "You see, she had absolutely nowhere else to go" (142). This sentence without "absolutely" would have made a sufficient enough point. Adverbs generally aren't the meat of a clause to begin with, and since this line closes the first half of the book, it punctuates itself nicely without any "superfluous" words. 

My muddled, not-yet-totally-developed instinct is that "absolutely" is meant to trick us into believing that he genuinely thought of alternatives. It's an extremely bad trick if you've been paying attention at all, but I can't think of another reason for that word to be included. Just one, final attempt of Humbert's at convincing the reader that Lolita belongs with him.